Suspicious survey

I received an email today from Acurian, asking me to take a “brief and confidential market research survey” to “assess the prevalence of specific types of cardiovascular and heart-related conditions.” It made me a little suspicious. An email survey isn’t exactly the best way to assess prevalence of such conditions. Meanwhile Acurian is in the business of recruiting patients for clinical trials.

To entice people to participate there is the promise of a raffle for three prizes: $200, $100, and $50 for a whopping $350 in total. The first question asks for:

“Your E-mail… so that we may contact you if you are a $200, $100, or $50 raffle winner.”

I decided to take the survey without providing my email address. I don’t care about the raffle and I didn’t want to attach my email address to my results.

The survey asks whether I have certain heart conditions (e.g., heart failure, atrial fibrillation), what medications I take to treat the conditions, what procedures I’ve undergone, whether I’ve had a heart attack or stroke, and what might motivate me to participate in a clinical trial or prevent me from doing so.

Then there are some specific demographic questions including zip code, age, income, insurance status and race.

I filled everything in and then hit “Submit Survey.” My survey was rejected because I didn’t provide my email address. It made me wonder –are they really so worried I might miss out on the raffle? Or are they building their database of potential trial participants?

My email address plus what I’d included in my survey plus a cursory search on Google would be enough to identify me and build a substantial file. There are no specifics given about a privacy policy or how the information will be used beyond the statement that the survey is confidential.

I’m going to write to the the CEO and ask what is going on. Stay tuned.

January 3, 2007

3 thoughts on “Suspicious survey”

  1. It is possible they are fishing for study subjects, but it is also possible that they are just sloppy. The similarity of the questions to study inclusion criteria, however, suggest that this is fishing.

    If you created the email address of you could reduce the privacy risks. However, the fact that you got the survey by email suggests that they already have your email address, though I don’t see a query string in the URL so it looks like that is not passed along to the survey form.

  2. David:

    I agree that an e-mail survey is not the best way to “assess the prevalence of specific types of cardiovascular and heart-related conditions.” In what population? A self-selected sample of Internet users? They’d be better off checking with the AHA or the National Center for Health Statistics for this data. Both organizations have got lots of wonderful charts that you can spend years going through.

    Not the best use of resources I’d say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *